TOTAL: {[ getCartTotalCost() | currencyFilter ]} Update cart for total shopping_basket Checkout
Webcon_PA_300x250_ad_November_Bloomberg_2017_121317
OneTrust_tile_ads_300x250_final_20170725_
GDPR-Ready_300x250-Ad

A landmark case about metadata in Australia has challenged the scope of Australian privacy laws, overruled the privacy commissioner, and left practitioners with questions. Anna Johnston writes for Privacy Tracker about a court case that began by trying to determine whether journalist Ben Grubb was identifiable from geolocation data held by Telstra, and ended in the Federal Court's determination that "the phrase 'about an individual' is an important element in the definition of personal information," writes Johnston. While the Federal Court agreed with the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ruling that "personal information must be 'about' an individual and that individual’s identity must be reasonably ascertainable," it also left the door open to a more expansive view than that of the AAT. What we still don't know is whether Ben Grubb's metadata is, in fact, personal information.
Full Story

Comments

If you want to comment on this post, you need to login.