TOTAL: {[ getCartTotalCost() | currencyFilter ]} Update cart for total shopping_basket Checkout

Europe Data Protection Digest | Bloomberg wins privacy case under section 32 of the Data Protection Act Related reading: What Equifax means for understanding the dangers of OSS

rss_feed
OneTrust_SmartPrivacy_banner_ads_300x250_20170818_
Webcon_PA_300x250_ad_September_2017_OneTrust
Webcon_PA_300x250_ad_September_Privacy-Analytics_2017

A case involving a Bloomberg article highlights the “journalistic defense” under section 32 of the Data Protection Act, Out-Law.com reports. Justice Neil Garnham ruled Bloomberg was protected under Section 32 when it published an article about a man, referred to as ZXC, who was linked to a criminal investigation. The man wanted the article taken down, stating his privacy was violated under section 10 of the DPA, and said Bloomberg’s section 32 defense was invalid, as the media company could not prove the article was in the public’s best interest. “[Bloomberg] rely on the witness statement of the author of the article. That statement … makes it clear that the decision to refer to [ZXC] in the article was taken after careful consideration of the relevant circumstances, including the public interest in the disclosure of [ZXC's] involvement,” said Garnham. “In my judgment, it is clear that [Bloomberg] as data controller believed, and believed on reasonable grounds, that publication would be in the public interest.”
Full Story

Comments

If you want to comment on this post, you need to login.