On October 3, 2017, the Irish High Court handed down this 129 page judgement agreeing with Schrems' view that the Irish Data Protection Commission has "well founded concerns" over U.S. surveillance of Facebook. The court will, on Oct. 11, determine questions that will be referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The CJEU ruling may have a significant effect on U.S. electronic communications service providers and their use of standard contractual clauses to transfer data from the EU.
Irish High Court Decision in DPC v. Facebook Ireland Limited and Max Schrems
Related Stories
EU-US Privacy Shield
This topic page contains a curation of the IAPP's coverage, analysis and relevant resources covering the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield....
It’s Schrems, round two
3
All this month, Max Schrems is back in court in Dublin. Not content with bringing down Safe Harbor, Schrems is sticking to his guns and coming after Standard Contractual Clauses and may even inadvertently demolish Privacy Shield — Safe Harbor’s much-maligned successor — along the w...
LIBE Committee declares Privacy Shield 'inadequate' by narrow margin
Members of the European Parliament’s civil liberties, justice and home affairs committee (LIBE) narrowly voted Thursday to support a resolution declaring Privacy Shield to be inadequate.
The trans-border data transfer framework, drawn up by the European Commission with the U.S. Department of Commer...
EU ePrivacy Regulation
This topic page contains a curation of the IAPP's coverage, analysis and relevant resources covering EU ePrivacy Regulation....
U.S. surveillance and the eye of the beholder
1
Is a country’s privacy regime adequate? To people who are not privacy professionals, this question may seem odd. What does adequacy of a legal framework mean? Is being “adequate” even a good thing?
But for privacy professionals, the context is clear. European law allows the transfer of personal dat...