How Defendants Are Attacking CCPA Claims
This chart identifies some of the arguments raised by defendants seeking to avoid liability for alleged violations of the CCPA.
Contributors:
Dale Rappaneau
AIGP, CIPP/E, CIPP/US, CIPM, CIPT
This resource provides an overview of the legal strategies defendants are using to challenge claims brought under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). As plaintiffs have filed more than 140 CCPA‑related actions, defendants have developed a range of arguments aimed at avoiding liability under the law’s limited private right of action. The chart highlights several recurring defense approaches, including arguments that the CCPA does not apply retroactively, that plaintiffs fail to meet the statute’s definition of a “consumer,” that alleged personal information was not “nonencrypted and nonredacted,” or that plaintiffs have not sufficiently linked security deficiencies to the alleged breach.
It also illustrates how defendants invoke narrower statutory definitions, challenge causation, and question Article III standing in federal court.

This content is eligible for Continuing Professional Education credits. Please self-submit according to CPE policy guidelines.
Submit for CPEsContributors:
Dale Rappaneau
AIGP, CIPP/E, CIPP/US, CIPM, CIPT
Tags: