Resource Center / Tools and Trackers / Guidance notes for responding to ‘Schrems II’
Guidance notes for responding to ‘Schrems II’
This article series provides guidance notes on what the 'Schrems II' decision means for companies that rely on the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield.
Published: July 2020
In response to the Court of Justice of the European Union’s historic ruling July 16, 2020, on the so-called “Schrems II” court case, members from Baker McKenzie shared a series of guidance notes on what the decision means for companies that rely on EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, controller-to-processor standard contractual clauses, SCCs for transfers to controllers, derogations/exceptions to transfer restrictions, and binding corporate rules, as well as for Brexit and what companies can expect with the road ahead on these issues.
-
expand_more
View contributors
- Part One: What Privacy Shield organizations should do
- Part Two: Controller-to-processor SCCs
- Part Three: Data transfers and Brexit
- Part Four: Impact on controller-to-controller SCCs
- Part Seven: BCRs as a robust alternative
- Part Six: Impacts on companies that rely on derogations
- Part Seven: Technology, media and telecommunications services
- Part Eight: Predictions for the road ahead after ‘Schrems II’