Under the 2008 FISA Amendments Act, Section 702 allows U.S. intelligence agencies to conduct surveillance on persons overseas it believes to be a potential threat. But the government is forbidden from collecting intelligence via Section 702 on persons “reasonably believed” to be within the U.S. or even a U.S. person outside of U.S. borders. But critics say there’s reason to believe U.S. persons are often incidentally the target of investigations, despite the rules stating otherwise, and that the secrecy surrounding intelligence operations allows it to happen en masse. 702 is set to expire on Dec. 31, and intelligence officials have argued it should be renewed wholesale. But critics of the program say it should be renewed only with amendments that increase privacy protections for innocent Americans whose data may be swept up in the data collected. And what happens with 702 may have a broader impact on international agreements like the Privacy Shield, for example, which is already on shaky ground, in part, because of concerns over U.S. intelligence agencies use of the data it collects. In this episode of The Privacy Advisor Podcast, Angelique Carson, CIPP/US, travels to American University to talk to law professor Jennifer Daskal to talk about what she thinks might happen on or before Dec. 31.
15 Dec. 2017
The Privacy Advisor Podcast: What will Congress do with Section 702?
Related stories
Privacy in the age of robotics: A discussion with Erin Relford
GPS 2025: Sam Altman, Alex Blania discuss Tools for Humanity's biometric technology
Notes from the IAPP Canada: An evolving approach to privacy amid geopolitical shifts
GPS 2025: European regulators reflect on pay or consent enforcement, concerns
GPS 2025: Collaboration, precision highlight future of US state privacy law enforcement
This article is eligible for Continuing Professional Education credits. Please self-submit according to CPE policy guidelines.