In an op-ed for The Atlantic, Social Science Research Council Just Tech Fellow Chris Gilliard calls wearable technologies users pay for to track, monitor and quantify certain features “luxury surveillance.” He writes, “Consumers may believe that they have nothing to fear (or hide) from these luxury-surveillance devices, or that adopting this technology could only benefit them. But these very devices are now leveraged against people by their employers, the government, their neighbors, stalkers, and domestic abusers. To buy into these ecosystems is to tacitly support their associated harms.”
20 Oct. 2022
Op-ed: Buying into ‘luxury surveillance’ supports its ‘associated harms’
Related stories
CPPA executive director offers window into agency's priorities
New state laws protect abuse survivors from misuse of vehicle connectivity
How a recent settlement represents a warning and relief for the adtech industry
Notes from the IAPP Canada: Privacy watchdogs — What the 2024–25 annual reports reveal
A view from DC: Competing Republican visions for tech policy in the 119th Congress