As we reported in the Daily Dashboard yesterday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted Thursday morning to renew Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendments Act for six years. An alternative bill put forth by Reps. Justin Amash, R-Mich., and Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., was voted down. The alternative bill, which garnered support from liberal and conservative civil liberties lawmakers, would have required that the government get a warrant prior to searching through the data of American citizens. Prior to the vote Thursday morning, President Donald Trump tweeted out two conflicting posts about Section 702, prompting House Democrats to ask for a delay in the House vote. In this episode, IAPP Westin Fellow Lee Matheson, CIPP/E, CIPP/US, talks to Angelique Carson, CIPP/US, about what privacy pros should know about yesterday's vote and what it means for coming days. Are you a podcast consumer? Be sure to subscribe to the RSS feed here.
12 Jan. 2018
The Privacy Advisor Podcast special edition: Yesterday's House vote on 702
Related stories
When cybersecurity becomes a compliance obligation: Lessons from the Illumina FCA settlement
Dressing old laws in class-action suits: Tracking technologies that disclose personal information
Notes from the IAPP Canada: Trust in AI requires good guardrails, governance
A view from DC: Is the US privacy patchwork here to stay?
With rules finalized, India's DPDPA takes force
This article is eligible for Continuing Professional Education credits. Please self-submit according to CPE policy guidelines.
