En el contexto de la emergencia sanitaria global y el acceso a la información personal, generalmente sensible, se crea una serie de tensiones frente a las normas de protección de datos. Esta breve reflexión plantea algunos puntos de tensión y análisis para revisar y explorar frente al reto de la privacidad y el tratamiento de la información en medio de una pandemia.
Nota Completa
shareShare This
Related Stories
Op-ed: Striking a ‘constructive balance’ on preemption
In a piece for The Brookings Institution, Tisch Distinguished Visiting Fellow Cameron Kerry and Nonresident Senior Fellow John Morris Jr. write preemption of state privacy laws and private right of action have stalled federal privacy legislation. In this first of a two-part series, they discuss pree...
What is the role of privacy professionals in preventing discrimination and ensuring equal treatment?
It is increasingly clear that preventing discrimination and ensuring equal treatment is a very important topic, not only for individuals, the general public and authorities, but for corporations, as well.
Cases of racial injustice, age discrimination or workplace discrimination are all topics that ...
Privacy pros can play a big role in preventing discrimination
Preventing discrimination and ensuring equal treatment has become a very important topic, not only for individuals, the general public and authorities, but for corporations, as well. In this Privacy Perspectives piece, ABB Senior Counsel Data Privacy Piotr Foitzik, CIPP/A, CIPP/C, CIPP/E, CIPP/G, CI...
Subway facial recognition system raises data security, privacy concerns
Consumer rights groups have initiated a civil lawsuit claiming a subway facial recognition system in São Paulo, Brazil, will not sufficiently protect user privacy, ZDNet reports. The technology will scan faces of 4 million passengers daily, and the groups said its impact is unknown. A study on datab...
Washington, DC, should regulate police surveillance technology
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, author Andrew Guthrie Ferguson writes it’s time for Washington, D.C., to regulate police surveillance technology. There is no local legislation, he says, while the technology is being used to monitor racial protests. “Regulating police surveillance is not the sam...
Comments
If you want to comment on this post, you need to login.