ANALYSISMEMBER

Data brokers, beware: Distinguishing PADFAA from the DOJ's DSP

Published
Subscribe to IAPP Newsletters

Contributors:

Cheryl Saniuk-Heinig

CIPP/E, CIPP/US, CIPM

Former research and insights analyst, IAPP

Jim Dempsey

Lecturer, UC Berkeley Law; Managing Director, Cybersecurity Law Center

IAPP

Within the past year, the U.S. has adopted two parallel legal frameworks aiming to address the national security risks of transactions involving sensitive personal data: the Protecting Americans' Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024 and the U.S. Department of Justice's Data Security Program. While the two regimes share a common objective — protecting U.S. sensitive personal data from access or misuse by foreign adversaries — they regulate different entities and operate under markedly different structures. For U.S. entities engaging globally, distinguishing between these frameworks is essential.

The DSP is a regulatory program created under Executive Order 14117. It is administered by the DOJ and applies to a broad range of U.S. persons and transaction types. It sets volume-based thresholds for covered data and allows certain data transfers to proceed if security, contractual and diligence requirements are met. The PADFAA, by contrast, was enacted by Congress. Enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, it applies only to data brokers but prohibits transactions of any volume.

Both instruments reflect a growing trend in data regulation, where geopolitical considerations increasingly shape cross-border data practices.  

PADFAA: Scope and core prohibitions

Effective as of June 2024, the PADFAA applies to "data brokers" and prohibits certain data transactions absolutely without any risk-based exceptions or mitigation mechanisms. More specifically, it prohibits any data broker from selling, licensing, renting, trading, transferring, releasing, disclosing, providing access to or otherwise making available “personally identifiable sensitive data” of a U.S individual to a “foreign adversary country” or to any entity controlled by a foreign adversary.

Contributors:

Cheryl Saniuk-Heinig

CIPP/E, CIPP/US, CIPM

Former research and insights analyst, IAPP

Jim Dempsey

Lecturer, UC Berkeley Law; Managing Director, Cybersecurity Law Center

IAPP

MEMBER

Unlock this exclusive content and more

Join the IAPPAlready a member? Sign in

Membership opens up a world of resources

In-depth knowledge

From original research reports and daily news coverage to legislative trackers and infographics, we have the information you need to stay ahead of change.

A global network

Make valuable professional connections through more than 160 local IAPP KnowledgeNet chapters in 70 countries.

Access to the experts

Connect with top thinkers in privacy, AI governance and cybersecurity for fresh ideas and insights.

Learn what you get from membership