UK—Court challenges IP address identification


Published
Contributors:
Phillip Lee
AIGP, CIPP/E, CIPM, FIP
Country Leader, UK, IAPP; Zettabyte Lawyer (Managing Director) and Solicitor
Digiphile
A UK court has questioned whether IP addresses can be used to identify a specific individual accused of copyright infringement (Media CAT Limited v Adams &Ors [2011]).
Judge Birrs QC, presiding, queried whether an IP address could reliably establish that the accused had infringed copyright, saying, “The fact that someone [at that IP address] may have infringed does not mean the particular named defendant has done so.”
This case calls into question the commonly held view in Europe that IP addresses constitute personal data.
Judge Birrs QC, presiding, queried whether an IP address could reliably establish that the accused had infringed copyright, saying, “The fact that someone [at that IP address] may have infringed does not mean the particular named defendant has done so.”
This case calls into question the commonly held view in Europe that IP addresses constitute personal data.
Contributors:
Phillip Lee
AIGP, CIPP/E, CIPM, FIP
Country Leader, UK, IAPP; Zettabyte Lawyer (Managing Director) and Solicitor
Digiphile



