Avoiding privacy lawsuits in 2026: Lessons from real claims and settlements


Contributors:
Alexander Proctor
AIGP, CIPP/E, CIPP/US, CIPM, CIPT, FIP
Chief Trust & Privacy Officer
Captain Compliance
Brought to you by Captain Compliance
Privacy litigation tied to website and communications tracking is accelerating, and it has become a recurring risk for organizations operating online. Claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act, the U.S. Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and similar statutes increasingly hinge on technical interpretations of consent, tracking behavior and notice practices, turning routine analytics and marketing tracking into potential legal exposure.
In this session, we will break down how these lawsuits are built, why certain organizations are repeatedly targeted, and what litigators look for when claims survive early motions. The discussion will focus on practical ways to reduce risk through effective privacy notices, enforceable consent, script governance and auditable records, including how privacy operations platforms such as Captain Compliance and risk-mitigation offerings like ComplianceShield can help organizations strengthen their defense posture and manage financial exposure.
Avoiding privacy lawsuits in 2026: Lessons from real claims and settlements

This content is eligible for Continuing Professional Education credits. Please self-submit according to CPE policy guidelines.
Submit for CPEsContributors:
Alexander Proctor
AIGP, CIPP/E, CIPP/US, CIPM, CIPT, FIP
Chief Trust & Privacy Officer
Captain Compliance