In this week’s Privacy Tracker legislative roundup, read about a plan between Labor and the Australian government that may see the controversial data retention plan enacted. In Canada, a new government proposal would see greater information-sharing between agencies such as immigration, Employment Canada and the RCMP. Russia’s lower chamber of Parliament has reportedly approved new and larger fines for violating data protection laws. Also, read an overview of 10 California privacy bills, new U.S. senators’ pre- and post-election commitments to privacy and more.

LATEST NEWS

ADVERTISEMENT

PLI,  Earn privacy CPE and CLE credits: Watch anytime online or on our mobile app, topics include AI, privacy, cybersecurity, and data law

The Hill reports that U.S. Reps. Tom Marino (R-PA) and Suzan DelBene (D-WA) are introducing the Law Enforcement Access to Data Stored Abroad Act, an identical act to the one proposed by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) in the Senate.

The executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia tells WDBJ about the Virginia General Assembly session that included a Stingray bill, a drone bill and a license-plate reader bill.

ICYMI

In this Privacy Tracker post, Emily Yu, CIPP/US, provides a history of In re Hulu Privacy Litigation, noting it "reveals trends in online consumer privacy concerns and ...  Any business that uses tracking technology and social networking on their websites should pay attention."

U.S.

John Stephens and Paul Pittman write in this exclusive for The Privacy Advisor about a French court order over the right to be forgotten and the significant questions it raises about whether a U.S. court would enforce an order requiring Google to remove certain information from its search engine worldwide.

According to the Los Angeles Times, a ruling by the Federal Communications Commission could be a privacy "game-changer" because it would require ISPs to obtain consent prior to monitoring and sharing of personal information.

CANADA

Rahool Agarwal writes for Mondaq that Hopkins v Kay “provides important guidance in the fields of privacy law and class actions, as well as with respect to the sustainability of privacy claims that touch upon areas governed by legislation."

EU