ANALYSISMEMBER

ANPD'S 2026 reorganization: What it means for privacy and data protection in Brazil

The agency's evolution reflects a shift toward deeper enforcement and heightened operational privacy demands for organizations in Brazil.

Published
Subscribe to IAPP Newsletters

Contributors:

Tiago Neves Furtado

CIPP/E, CIPM, CDPO/BR, FIP

Partner

Opice Blum

Lucas Mendes do Nascimento

CIPM, CDPO/BR

Attorney

Opice Blum

Brazil's data protection landscape is entering a new phase. With the publication of Resolution No. 33, the Agência Nacional de Proteção de Dados is no longer an agency in formation. It is positioning itself as a mature regulator, equipped to operate at scale, with technical depth and strategic focus.

For organizations operating in Brazil, this shift is more than administrative. It signals a change in how enforcement will occur, how risks will be identified and, ultimately, how privacy programs should be designed going forward.

From institutional setup to operational maturity

Since its creation, the ANPD has been building its institutional foundations, defining procedures, issuing guidance and gradually increasing enforcement activity. Resolution No. 33 marks a turning point in this trajectory.

The expansion of the agency's structure, increasing roles from 118 to 148, is not simply a matter of size. It reflects a deliberate strategy: more operational capacity at the technical level and less concentration at the top. By reallocating resources toward frontline functions, the ANPD is preparing for a higher volume of cases, more complex investigations and a more continuous presence in the market.

At the same time, the new structure abandons a generic organizational model in favor of thematic and sector-based specialization. This is a critical development. It suggests that the regulator intends to understand how data is used in specific industries, rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach.

For companies, this means interactions with the ANPD will likely become more sophisticated and less predictable for those relying on generic compliance frameworks.

Contributors:

Tiago Neves Furtado

CIPP/E, CIPM, CDPO/BR, FIP

Partner

Opice Blum

Lucas Mendes do Nascimento

CIPM, CDPO/BR

Attorney

Opice Blum

MEMBER

Unlock this exclusive content and more

Join the IAPPAlready a member? Sign in

Membership opens up a world of resources

In-depth knowledge

From original research reports and daily news coverage to legislative trackers and infographics, we have the information you need to stay ahead of change.

A global network

Make valuable professional connections through more than 160 local IAPP KnowledgeNet chapters in 70 countries.

Access to the experts

Connect with top thinkers in privacy, AI governance and cybersecurity for fresh ideas and insights.

Learn what you get from membership