On November 24, 2009, the Higher Regional Court of Duesseldorf issued an interesting ruling on the burden of proof for consents to e-mail marketing measures. The court found that a company that purchases e-mail addresses for the purpose of distributing electronic advertisements must not rely on the seller’s representation that all data subjects have consented to receive marketing e-mails. Rather, the purchaser shall be obliged to verify whether the intended recipients have consented. Due to the fact that German marketing regulations generally require an “explicit” consent in order for e-mail marketing measures to be lawful, the purchaser of the data will be obliged to check whether these consents are documented (e.g. in a written declaration). If a company does not comply with this prior-checking requirement, it might be held responsible for the unsolicited mailings.
01 March 2010
Court ruling: burden of proof for consent to e-mail marketing
![Default Article Featured Image_laptop-newspaper-global-article-090623[95].jpg](https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/bltd4dd5b2d705252bc/blt61f52659e86e1227/64ff207a8606a815d1c86182/laptop-newspaper-global-article-090623[95].jpg?width=3840&quality=75&format=pjpg&auto=webp)
Related stories
Hochul enacts New York's AI safety and transparency bill
Notes from the IAPP Canada: 2025 — A year in review
A view from DC: Can the FTC preempt state AI laws?
US House subcommittees explore cybersecurity implications of AI, quantum computing
Notes from the Asia-Pacific region: Insights from IAPP Pan-India KnowledgeNet and Risk GCC
