As policy-makers in Washington, DC, and Brussels meet to discuss possible alternatives to Safe Harbor in order to keep data flowing across the Atlantic, corporate privacy professionals are facing an immediate need to respond to the landmark decision in the Schrems case. The IAPP has received dozens of questions about next steps, and in this first in a series of seven pieces, Bird & Bird's Ruth Boardman, a member of the IAPP's GDPR expert faculty, and James Mullock, CIPP/E, address enforcement of the Safe Harbor ruling and some potential solutions for The Privacy Advisor. Meanwhile, in one Privacy Perspectives, postBrian Hengesbaugh, CIPP/US, offers five common myths about Safe Harbor in order to “set the record straight,” while in another, Stuart Ritchie examines the question of what really sank Safe Harbor.
Full Story