TOTAL: {[ getCartTotalCost() | currencyFilter ]} Update cart for total shopping_basket Checkout

Daily Dashboard | Swire: Advocate General’s Views About U.S. Intel Laws Are Inaccurate Related reading: Evolving privacy law 'exciting' for IAPP Westin Scholar

rss_feed

""

""

With a highly anticipated decision from the Court of Justice of the EU expected tomorrow, the fate of Safe Harbor is in question. But was Advocate General (AG) Yves Bot’s opinion based on an accurate review of U.S. intelligence laws? No, writes Georgia Institute of Technology Prof. Peter Swire, CIPP/US, adding, “In my experience as a scholar and practitioner in the field, the U.S. has far more extensive legal rules, oversight and other checks and balances on intelligence agencies than is generally true in the EU member states.” In this post for Privacy Perspectives, Swire shares his analysis of the AG’s opinion in relation to U.S. law and his own first-hand experience while serving on the president’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technology.
Full Story

Comments

If you want to comment on this post, you need to login.