TOTAL: {[ getCartTotalCost() | currencyFilter ]} Update cart for total shopping_basket Checkout

Daily Dashboard | SCOTUS nominee Gorsuch's privacy rulings examined Related reading: New for PSR: 'Strategic Privacy by Design'

rss_feed
GDPR-Ready_300x250-Ad
DPC18_Web_300x250-COPY

Ars Technica has done a roundup of Supreme Court justice nominee Neil Gorsuch's privacy rulings and subsequent legal attitudes, finding that in an August 2016 decision, "Gorsuch ruled in favor of e-mail privacy." The case revolved around the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and its opening of "e-mails sent to it by ISPs whose filters detected child pornography," and whether it was a Fourth Amendment search. Gorsuch called the move one that "pretty clearly [qualified] as exactly the type of trespass to chattels that the framers sought to prevent when they adopted the Fourth Amendment." Additionally, Gorsuch affirmed in a March 2016 dissent that a "'knock and talk' violated the Fourth Amendment when a defendant had a 'no trespassing' sign on the door," the report states.
Full Story

Comments

If you want to comment on this post, you need to login.