TOTAL: {[ getCartTotalCost() | currencyFilter ]} Update cart for total shopping_basket Checkout

Canada Dashboard Digest | Opinion: Bell Case “Offers Little Clarity” on PIPEDA Related reading: How GDPR is impacting the way privacy is done

rss_feed
PrivacyCore_ad_300x250-01
iapp-privacycore
Webcon_PA_300x250_ad_Oct_2017_BigID

In a commentary for Law Times, Mark Hayes writes of the recent outcome of Chitrakar v. Bell TV, where the Federal Court of Canada awarded $20,000 in damages for breach of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). “Many academic commentators and privacy lawyers suggested the decision might signal a sea change in the attitude of the courts towards damages under PIPEDA and possibly other provincial privacy statutes,” he writes, countering, “This is unlikely.” He goes on to suggest, “It’s doubtful Chitrakar will have much precedential value because of the unique circumstances and the questionable judgment shown by Bell in ignoring the Federal Court proceedings.”
Full Story

Comments

If you want to comment on this post, you need to login.