The Los Angeles Times Editorial Board wrote a piece opposing preemption in the proposed American Data Privacy and Protection Act. The board said the current framework around preemption is "unacceptable" due in large part to the fact that the ADPPA is "weaker than the privacy laws on the books in California." A proposed solution by the board would be to devise a model closer to the Clean Air Act, which "allows California to set a tougher standard than the national one and lets states choose which they want to follow." Editor's note: The IAPP's Joe Duball reported on ADPPA preemption opposition from U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
12 Sept. 2022
Op-ed: US Congress can't 'water down' Californians' rights with proposed ADPPA
RELATED STORIES
Notes from the IAPP Canada: DPAs to gather for 46th Global Privacy Assembly
Presidential election 2024: Where the candidates stand on privacy and AI governance policy
A view from DC: US government builds AI governance through policies, panels and procurement
Ontario IPC's Transparency Challenge submissions showcase personal data utilization
Notes from the Asia-Pacific region: Facial recognition in focus for NZ