OneTrust_Square Banner_300x250_DD_ROS_01_19
Is Advising Clients To Clean Up Social Media After Filing a Lawsuit Questionable?

A recent article stirred up quite a bit of discussion among my LinkedIn friends.

Opposing counsel requested discovery of a plaintiff’s Facebook page. The plaintiff’s attorney advised him to clean it up and was suspended for five years from the practice of law. The disciplinary system actions states the suspension was for “violating professional rules that govern candor toward the tribunal, fairness to opposing party and counsel and misconduct.”

My immediate reaction on the title of the article “lawyer agrees to five-year suspension for advising client to clean up his Facebook account” had me on the side of the lawyer. It makes sense to clean up one’s image in a lawsuit—as long as doing so doesn’t hide incriminating evidence, etc. But in reading the article, and learning that this advice came after a discovery request, of course interfering with discovery orders would warrant discipline for an attorney. It has overtones of Enron’s paper-shredding party.

Advising clients to clean up social media after a discovery request for that information is clearly wrong.

So let’s take this a step back. Let’s pretend there was no discovery request.

Is advising clients to clean up social media after filing a lawsuit questionable? Is advising clients to clean up social media before filing a lawsuit good? Bad? Is that hiding the smoking gun?

And this was a civil action, meaning one person sued another. Would it make any difference if it was a criminal action? If the lawyer was a defense attorney, is this merely trial strategy?

Does cleaning up one’s social media image fall into the realm of one having the right not to incriminate oneself? Of course, we’ve all heard the stories of law enforcement electronically patrolling social media to find criminal action—threats against a politician, child abuse, robbery. It makes sense to look online for bad behavior. But this possibility goes beyond that. This is akin to telling your client to go to church, no wild parties, wear a suit to court and keep your nose clean before trial.

Or is it?

If a criminal defendant has a diary—an old-fashioned paper one—is that protected from discovery? What if it is an online diary that is kept private between the client and the diary software, server host, Internet provider and any hackers who are interested? Sure, if a person knows he is facing potential liability for an action that he writes about in letters that are not mailed, diaries, etc.—the person can do whatever he wants to that information, but can his lawyer advise him to do so? Is this a right against self-incrimination?

Now when we take this further and publish incriminating information on social media, at what point does a court consider it private? Should we need to check a person’s privacy settings before deciding if they are private or not? Is the fact that it is online cross that privacy line? Does it matter how many “friends” have access to the information?

This is an interesting twist to social media privacy. Certainly, the best thing is not to post things on social media that you would not want posted on the front page of a newspaper or shown on the six o’clock news. Very few individuals on popular social media consider ramifications that could result from an improvident posting. Hopefully, very few individuals intend to commit criminal behavior. But one rarely anticipates nasty civil actions. So if I tell you to clean up your social media image right now, it is not legal advice. It may, however, be common sense.

What is your view on lawyers advising clients to clean up their social media or on individuals cleaning up their social media prior to pending legal action, civil or criminal? Is social media self-incrimination?

Written By



If you want to comment on this post, you need to login.

  • Matt Aug 14, 2013

    With due respect, I believe the states that "if a person knows he is facing potential liability for an action that he writes about in letters that are not mailed, diaries, etc.—the person can do whatever he wants to that information" is flat wrong.  It amounts to the statement that private, internal documents relevant to a disputed matter can be destroyed, notwithstanding contemplated litigation.  Shades of Enron.
    If a potential litigant writes a letter about a fact that is likely to be material to reasonably expected litigation, it is spoliation.  That is true whether the material is in a personal diary, Facebook, or a memo from the CFO to the CEO.  The retention and preservation duty affixes based on the content of the material and its materiality, not based on its location or the manner in which it is kept.  As I understand it, the attorney was disciplined not because of timing, but because he advised his client to commit a tort and hide evidence.
    The deeper issue, to me, has to do with identifying what information is relevant.  One directs one's client to clean up and wear a suit to trial because the client's appearance should be irrelevant to the decision and you want to avoid prejudicing the fact finder.  Here, the excluded photographs might be relevant to a claim of loss of consortium, but could not possibly be relevant to a claim of wrongful death.  Presumably if the attorney had successfully kept them out of the courtroom the failure to produce them, and destruction of them, would have been excused.
  • Mark Aug 15, 2013

    What I am concerned most about this article, is the lack of specific laws (privacy or otherwise) related to social media. 
    My Experience:
    Recently, I was involved in a tort action. My lawyer advised me not to delete anything from my Faceboook or Twitter accounts as we would be going into discovery. The issue I had, however, is that I had deleted several posts on my social media accounts, two days before my lawyer advised me not to. At discovery, my lawyer had to advise the other party that I had "unknowingly" deleted social media posts before being legally advised not to do so. Ultimately, the other party and their lawyer didn't care as they were not interested in my social media.
  • K Aug 18, 2013

    Matt, these same issues were the ones that prompted me to write the entry. My statement about a person can do whatever they want with letters and paper diaries was more along the line that the average person would not consider that their personal papers should not be destroyed, that it is "spoliation of evidence." They look at it from their own perspective that they simply may not want it to exist and until or unless they are told by the court or their attorney not to do so, it just does not occur to them that they are doing something that in the court's eyes may be illegal - especially if there is not a court involved at the time of destruction. It was not my intent to indicate that the court would approve of it - just that from a practical perspective, a single person burning their diary before there is a legal filing, before there is a court, or before there is an attorney - is not likely to be charged with spoliation of evidence. Corporate clients notwithstanding.
  • Scott Aug 21, 2013

    I think the most important element here when discussing paper diaries vs. social media (and what underpins Ms. Royal's statements) is that no one but the author may realize that the paper exists. Thus, if it is destroyed, likely no one would know but the destroyer. Social media, by its very nature, is public. It is known whether it exists and can be easily ascertained if any portion was destroyed. Key point: rarely is anything online ever truly destroyed.


Board of Directors

See the esteemed group of leaders shaping the future of the IAPP.

Contact Us

Need someone to talk to? We’re here for you.

IAPP Staff

Looking for someone specific? Visit the staff directory.

Learn more about the IAPP»

Daily Dashboard

The day’s top stories from around the world

Privacy Perspectives

Where the real conversations in privacy happen

The Privacy Advisor

Original reporting and feature articles on the latest privacy developments

Privacy Tracker

Alerts and legal analysis of legislative trends

Privacy Tech

Exploring the technology of privacy

Canada Dashboard Digest

A roundup of the top Canadian privacy news

Europe Data Protection Digest

A roundup of the top European data protection news

Asia-Pacific Dashboard Digest

A roundup of the top privacy news from the Asia-Pacific region

Latin America Dashboard Digest

A roundup of the top privacy news from Latin America

IAPP Westin Research Center

Original works. Groundbreaking research. Emerging scholars.

Get more News »

IAPP Communities

Meet locally with privacy pros, dive deep into specialized topics or connect over common interests. Find your Community in KnowledgeNet Chapters, Sections and Affinity Groups.

IAPP Job Board

Looking for a new challenge, or need to hire your next privacy pro? The IAPP Job Board is the answer.

Join the Privacy List

Have ideas? Need advice? Subscribe to the Privacy List. It’s crowdsourcing, with an exceptional crowd.

Find a KnowledgeNet Chapter Near You

Talk privacy and network with local members at IAPP KnowledgeNet Chapter meetings, taking place worldwide.

Find more ways to Connect »

Find a Privacy Training Class

Two-day privacy training classes are held around the world. See the complete schedule now.

The Privacy Core™ Library Has Evolved

Privacy Core™ e-learning essentials just expanded to include seven new units for marketers. Keep your data safe and your staff in the know!

Online Privacy Training

Build your knowledge. The privacy know-how you need is just a click away.

Upcoming Web Conferences

See our list of upcoming web conferences. Just log on, listen in and learn!

Train Your Team

Get your team up to speed on privacy by bringing IAPP training to your organization.

Let’s Get You DPO Ready

There’s no better time to train than right now! We have all the resources you need to meet the challenges of the GDPR.

Learn more »

CIPP Certification

The global standard for the go-to person for privacy laws, regulations and frameworks

CIPM Certification

The first and only privacy certification for professionals who manage day-to-day operations

CIPT Certification

The industry benchmark for IT professionals worldwide to validate their knowledge of privacy requirements

FIP Designation

Recognizing the advanced knowledge and issue-spotting skills a privacy pro must attain in today’s complex world of data privacy.

Certify Your Staff

Find out how you can bring the world’s only globally recognized privacy certification to a group in your organization.


The IAPP’S CIPP/E and CIPM are the ANSI/ISO-accredited, industry-recognized combination for DPO readiness. Learn more today.

Learn more about IAPP certification »

Are You Ready for the GDPR?

Check out the IAPP's EU Data Protection Reform page for all the tools and resources you need.

IAPP-OneTrust PIA Platform

New U.S. Government Agency privacy impact assessments - free to IAPP members!

IAPP Communities

Meet locally with privacy pros, dive deep into specialized topics or connect over common interests. Find your Community in KnowledgeNet Chapters, Sections and Affinity Groups.

Privacy Vendor List

Find a privacy vendor to meet your needs with our filterable list of global service providers.

More Resources »

Europe Data Protection Intensive 2017

The Intensive is sold out! But cancellations do happen—so hurry and get on the wait list in case more seats become available.

Global Privacy Summit 2017

The world’s premier privacy conference returns with the sharpest minds, unparalleled programs and preeminent networking opportunities.

Canada Privacy Symposium 2017

The Symposium returns to Toronto this spring and registration has opened! Take advantage of Early Bird rates and join your fellow privacy pros for another stellar program.

The Privacy Bar Section Forum 2017

The Privacy Bar Section Forum returns to Washington, DC April 21, delivering renowned keynote speakers and a distinguished panel of legal and privacy experts.

Asia Privacy Forum 2017

The Forum returns to Singapore for exclusive networking and intensive education on data protection trends and challenges in the Asia Pacific region. Call for Speakers open!

Privacy. Security. Risk. 2017

This year, we're bringing P.S.R. to San Diego. The Call for Speakers is now open. Submit today and be a part of something big! Submission deadline: February 26.

Europe Data Protection Congress 2017

European policy debate, multi-level strategic thinking and thought-provoking discussion. The Call for Speakers is open until March 19.

Sponsor an Event

Increase visibility for your organization—check out sponsorship opportunities today.

More Conferences »

Become a Member

Start taking advantage of the many IAPP member benefits today

Corporate Members

See our list of high-profile corporate members—and find out why you should become one, too

Renew Your Membership

Don’t miss out for a minute—continue accessing your benefits

Join the IAPP»