On June 3, the U.S. Supreme Court released its opinion on the case Van Buren v. United States. The opinion provides clarification regarding how the Supreme Court interprets the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, particularly the “exceeds authorized access” language in Section 1030(a)(2). IAPP Westin Research Fellows Sarah Rippy and Nicole Sakin explain that while the word “privacy” does not appear in the opinion, the holding may have important implications for individual privacy.
Full Story
Comments
If you want to comment on this post, you need to login.