TOTAL: {[ getCartTotalCost() | currencyFilter ]} Update cart for total shopping_basket Checkout

Daily Dashboard | SCOTUS Finds No "Actual Damages" in Pilot's Case Related reading: Italian Data Protection Authority issues first guidelines on GDPR-readiness

rss_feed
PrivacyTraining_ad300x250.Promo1-01
OneTrust_Square Banner_300x250_DD_ROS_01_19
Webcon_PA_300x250_ad_April-17_FINAL

By a split of five to three, with one justice not participating, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a pilot whose health information "was improperly shared between government agencies cannot collect damages for the emotional distress he suffered when he was punished for hiding his medical condition," The New York Times reports. The decision, which focused on the statutory meaning of "actual damages," overturned an earlier appeals court ruling in the pilot's favor, the report states. Justice Samuel A. Alito, who wrote the majority opinion, noted, "The Privacy Act does not unequivocally authorize an award of damages for mental or emotional distress." (Registration may be required to access this story.)
Full Story

Comments

If you want to comment on this post, you need to login.